
FakeApp / r/deepfakes
A Free Face-Swap Tool Industrializes Non-Consensual Celebrity Porn Before Anyone Approved It
In December 2017, an anonymous Reddit user calling himself "deepfakes" used a machine-learning face-swap algorithm, publicly available videos, and a home computer to graft the faces of celebrities onto pornographic footage.
- 01TRIGGERIn December 2017, an anonymous Reddit user calling himself "deepfakes" used a machine-learning face-swap algorithm,…
- 02MACHINE ACTIONAutonomous actor
- 03MISSING GATEIdentity verification and dual control
- 04IMPACTData security
The short version
In December 2017, an anonymous Reddit user calling himself "deepfakes" used a machine-learning face-swap algorithm, publicly available videos, and a home computer to graft the faces of celebrities onto pornographic footage.
Case telemetry
- INCIDENT
- SS-IR-008
- DATE
- February 7, 2018
- SYSTEM
- FakeApp / r/deepfakes
- LOCATION / SCOPE
- Global (originated on Reddit)
- EVIDENCE
- Reported
- AI ROLE
- Autonomous actor
- HARM
- Data security
- SOURCES
- 2 cited records
The event
In December 2017, an anonymous Reddit user calling himself "deepfakes" used a machine-learning face-swap algorithm, publicly available videos, and a home computer to graft the faces of celebrities onto pornographic footage. By January 2018 the technique had been packaged into FakeApp, a free desktop tool that let anyone with no technical skill produce the same fakes by selecting a video, downloading a pre-trained face model, and pressing one button. Within weeks FakeApp had been downloaded more than 100,000 times, and the r/deepfakes subreddit had swelled past 90,000 members mass-producing non-consensual sexual videos of Gal Gadot, Daisy Ridley, Emma Watson, Taylor Swift, Scarlett Johansson and others. On February 7, 2018, Reddit banned r/deepfakes and its sister communities for violating its involuntary-pornography policy, joining Twitter, Discord, Imgur, Pornhub and Gfycat, which had all moved to ban the content in the same window. It was the first mainstream deepfake-abuse crisis.
What the machine did
The harm was the model output, generated and distributed with zero human approval gate anywhere in the loop. The neural network performed the face-swap automatically; FakeApp wrapped that capability so the only human "decision" left was clicking a button, and no person ever reviewed, authorized, or signed off on whose face was being placed into whose pornography. The system was built to scale identity-theft-grade fabrication to anyone, at machine speed, with no consent check, no victim notification, and no accountable reviewer between the prompt and the published video. By the time platforms reacted, the tool had already industrialized a kind of abuse that previously required a skilled VFX studio - and there was no one in the pipeline who had ever been asked to say yes.
Where the failure landed
FakeApp's 100,000-plus downloads and the 90,000-member subreddit turned a fringe technique into an off-the-shelf weapon against real, named women in a matter of weeks, and the videos spread far faster than any single platform could remove them. The episode introduced "deepfake" into the mainstream vocabulary and triggered the first wave of platform bans, research into detection, and eventual legislation (US state non-consensual-deepfake laws, the UK Online Safety Act, and the 2025 federal TAKE IT DOWN Act). But the underlying tooling never went away - it forked, rebranded, and proliferated, seeding a non-consensual synthetic-porn ecosystem that studies have repeatedly found makes up the overwhelming majority of all deepfakes online and now overwhelmingly targets private individuals, not just celebrities.
Reported
Documented in the cited public record. Follow the sources for the precise evidentiary posture.
SOURCE RECORD UPDATED 2026-07-09
2 cited records
- 01
- 02
Identity verification and dual control
The failure pattern in this case: Unverified identity or synthetic media.
The moment the path could change
A named reviewer verifies identity through a separate trusted channel before money, access, or public claims can move.
Autonomy is a design choice.
See the operating model that keeps AI useful while preserving human authority at consequential moments.
Compare AgenticAI and AugmentedAI →